Politically incorrect

admin | Political | Thursday, 27 March 2008

You know, I was totally not expecting this to happen,
but it did. The Obama/pitt, Clinton/jolie connection. I can’t believe that I was ’sleeping’
on this and I’m a little angry about it! Back in the day when this presidential race started,
and Obama was just starting his ascent into prominence
as one of the democratic front runners, I read somewhere (and I can’t remember where it was or
what site I found it) that when George Clooney backed Obama, pitt wanted to publicly be added to the celebrity list that were backing him. Now don’t quote me verbatim, but the article said something like the Obama camp REFUSED brad pitt’s endorsement , but then they had thought differently about this and later said
that they would use either one or both of them somewhere down the line. I have question. Could it bethat Obama made good on this promise and had this article ’sent out’ so to speak, for pitt? I can’t say for sure, but it looks like this could be one of the
reasons for this silly article. USELESS is another word I would use.
What does it profit Obama OR CLINTON for that matter, to have the whole world know that pitt and jolie are both 9TH
COUSINS- TWICE REMOVED from these two democratic runners (pitt is Obama’s and jolie is Clinton’s)? I say that this information should be hidden OR BURIED
away from the public. This info doesn’t help OR hurt Obama. But it SURE DOESN’T HELP Hillary to have a tie-in with jolie!
Anyone with a brain would know that to HELP HILLARY- you’ve GOT to enlist Jennifer Aniston. No- I think that this is an Obama tactic. GOOD LUCK
HILLARY!!